Sperm Banks Held to Strict Products Liability

11 Apr

sperm

In 1995, a woman decided to purchase some sperm in order to conceive a child.  Unknowing to her, the sperm contained a “Fragile X” chromosome and would spawn a child with various defects.  A few weeks ago, a New York judge held that the sperm bank that sold the defective sperm was strictly liable for the defective sperm just like any other commercially sold product.  Once the daughter turns 18, she will now be able to sue the sperm bank for contracts and torts claims.

I love it!  Can we now move on to my theory that all children should have a 48 month return policy?  If I as a parent end up with a defective child, can I take it back like any other product with a warranty?

Full story @ Law.com

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: